Feeds:
Posts
Comments

Archive for the ‘Systems’ Category

Someone, whose opinion I value, told me that my comments on this blog seem to attack Barack Obama repeatedly. Since I advocate that the meaning of a message lies in how the receiver interprets it, I feel that I owe an apology to Barack Obama.

I don’t know Barack Obama; I have never even met him; and I have read very little about his personal history. From everything that I have seen of him, I think that he seems like a quite personable man. I even believe that I might enjoy conversing with him, even though we might disagree on a number of topical issues.

So, if my comments seem like I have attacked Barack Obama, the man, I apologize. I have nothing against him personally.

Here’s the other shoe.

President Obama, the present personification of the executive branch of the U.S. government, I disagree with vehemently. The President would have difficulty thinking up more detrimental programs and policies during this depression, than those espoused by President Obama.

His stimulus program has caused the misallocation of resources that the market would normally devote to economic recovery. His healthcare (or sickness care) proposal, if passed, will cause exactly what one would expect: rising costs and shortages. (Simple economics: You get more of what you subsidize. You subsidize sickness; you get more sickness. And, the government cannot calculate; it cannot know the appropriate cost of medical care.) His intrusion into the energy markets will cause more misallocation and probably higher costs.

Those represent only examples of why I criticize President Barack Obama.

But, even in criticizing the President, and not the man, I have committed another error in logic. The President does not act alone. Congress passes laws, and the Judiciary puts their stamp of approval on them (some argue that the Judiciary also passes laws.) So, for every reference that I have made to President Obama, maybe I should substitute “The Government.”

But, even that rather general reference would miss the point, for who really bears the blame for what has gone array in our political, economic system: You (second person plural). You have the President, the Congress, and the Judiciary that you have, because you put them in charge. You have the failed economic policies you have because you believe what they believe.

I offer a blanket apology to any person in position of President, Congressman, or Judge (or their defenders) that takes exception to what I write here. I criticize your behavior, not you.

In conclusion, I don’t make my critical comments to get You (the voter and consumer) to change these people; I write them to get you to change your mind.

Read Full Post »

Does this describe the entire web, or just blogging?

Read Full Post »

Formula One racing has, for the time being, avoided breakup.

The head of the F1 governing body will quit and many of his plans for reorganization will leave with him. (For those interested see… and related articles.)

Does this destroy my analogy about over-regulation. I don’t think so.

Read Full Post »

For nearly sixty years Formula One auto racing has held the position of the premier racing series in the world. Although not extremely popular in the USA, the worldwide following may exceed that of any other form of motor sport. The teams spend immense amounts of money on the sport and advertisers pay premium prices to have their names appear anywhere on the cars.

Sounds like a formula (punt intended) for sporting success, doesn’t it?

Well, over the last several years formula one racing seems to have developed a problem. And now the series may break into parts, and the experience of other racing series that have tried operating split schedules does not bode well for the future for formula one.

So, what has caused this breakup to occur after so many years of success?

Quite simply the organization that governs the formula one series has imposed an excessive amount of regulation. Over that last several years they have added one rule after another, many of them threatening the basic nature of the sport. Finally, this year they reached that proverbial “tipping point.” Too many regulations have caused a large group of the participants to break away and form their own group.

The details of this whole mess probably do not interest anyone reading this post, but the underlying lesson should.

The growth in regulation simply amounts to a growth in tyranny. In the early stages the people subjected to the regulation/tyranny do not object. They would rather stay in the game than risk elimination because of their objections. But, eventually the level of regulation reaches the point that people subjected to the regulation start to object. They either actively resist the rules or they leave the game.

Those in favor of ever greater regulation by the U.S. Government should bear this in mind. At what point does the regulation in this country reach a level that people recognize it as tyranny and either revolt or leave?

If formula one racing splits up or disappears because of excessive regulation/tyranny, a lot of people will not notice. Others will cheer, for they do consume a lot of resources and burn a lot of gas.

If, on the other hand, the U.S. economy breaks up because of excessive regulation/tyranny, don’t you think you will notice?

Read Full Post »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.